Talk:Samford University

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samford University article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama

Christianity: Baptist Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Baptist work group.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Notable Alumni Cumberland Law

Rania Majors 35 years of representing any, and everyone in Philadelphia committed activist, and community leader. She is on the ballot to become a judge, and join the ranks of your prestigious University. 2601:41:4301:46E0:34FE:EB81:176:D913 (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning revert

This revert did not provide an appropriate edit summary or rationale. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samford_University&diff=prev&oldid=1265765355

The edit summary was "unnecessary." However - nothing on wp is necessary. Not event the article.

It was an appropriate change that was reverted, however. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is unnecessary to have a long list on article A, when a more inclusive list on the same topic can be found on article B. Just direct readers on article A wishing to read the list...to article B. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and the best of holidays to you. I'm not sure you happened to notice my above note on the use of the word "unnecessary" here. I hope you are enjoying the holiday season. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Magnolia677 that a comprehensive and detailed listing that duplicates an existing category or list article is not necessary in this article. It's much more helpful to provide a summary of the existing category or list article and a link. ElKevbo (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's of course interesting. Please point me to a wp rule that states that anything on wikipedia is necessary. You as well seem not to be referring to the point that I've made twice above. I recognize that the two of you are experts. Happy holidays. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]